Independent review · diligence

Diligence request list

Completion is measured by whether the underlying document exists and can be inspected, not by whether it has been promised.


Corporate
  • [ ] Cap table
  • [ ] Financing instrument
  • [ ] Option pool
  • [ ] US / AU structure
IP
  • [x] Repository schedule
  • [ ] Assignment chain
  • [x] Third-party licences
  • [ ] Trademarks and domains
  • [x] Related entities
Open core
  • [x] Licence map
  • [x] Commercial boundary
  • [ ] Contribution policy
  • [ ] Governance
Technical
  • [x] Architecture map
  • [x] Rust verifier
  • [x] Python SDK
  • [x] Rails plane
  • [x] Schemas and fixtures
  • [ ] Retention boundary
Product
  • [x] Deterministic end-to-end demonstration
  • [x] Independently verifiable export
Commercial
  • [x] Prospect evidence
  • [ ] Downstream requirement
  • [ ] Willingness to pay
  • [ ] Integration status
Financial
  • [ ] Monthly 24-month model
  • [ ] Implementation gross margin
  • [ ] Recurring gross margin
Risk
  • [ ] Standard MSA / SOW
  • [ ] Security posture
  • [ ] Retention policy
  • [ ] Regulatory-language counsel
  • [ ] Key-person plan
Worked example

IP chain of title

Status
open
Why this matters
Multiple repositories and prior technical assets.
Required evidence
Repository scheduleAssignment documentContractor assignmentsDependency inventoryRelated-entity mapping
Blocking?
Yes
A checkmark that does not link to a document is a claim, and claims belong on the register with a status.

Independent review

Everything in this room

How this review is conducted

Every load-bearing claim exposes status, evidence held, missing proof, contrary evidence, falsifier and next decisive test. The burden is stated before the evidence is read, so an earlier rung of the ladder cannot imply a later one.

Reading through Overall

The native reading. Claim status, evidence burden, proof gates, falsifiers, contradictions, capital-to-proof, governance, downside, and explicit reasons to stop or narrow the thesis.