AgEvidenceInvestor Evidence Room
Technical Reference ↗GitHub ↗
Review through
OverallInvestmentTechnologyScienceNeutral
Independent review · downside

Downside survivability

The first financing should leave the company in a survivable state even if nothing else is raised.

ScenarioResponse
SDK works, nobody paysThe open project may remain useful; the venture thesis fails. Preserve the core, stop expansion.
Customers pay, but every project is bespokeNarrow to the use case that reuses, or re-underwrite as services-enabled software at different multiples.
Regulatory demand is slower than expectedSell only where a real recipient already demands evidence; do not fund market creation.
An incumbent bundles equivalent capabilityTest whether neutrality has economic value. Partner, reposition, or exit if it does not.
The next round never happensCut to essential operation, preserve the open core, service recurring contracts, stop expansion.
If there is no next round

Three acceptable states

A

Small profitable infrastructure company

Recurring operation covering a lean team.

B

Strategic acquisition candidate

Embedded boundary and reliance history worth acquiring.

C

Orderly open-source stewardship

The contract and verifier outlive the company.

The state to avoid

Unacceptable

  • High payroll
  • Many custom enterprise projects
  • No reusable core
  • Founder-managed promises
  • Needs rescue capital
Independent review

Everything in this room

Downside

A good first financing should leave more than one survivable state.

If the venture thesis fails but a handful of customers value the infrastructure, the company may become a small profitable business. If integrations and evidence contracts are strategically valuable before scale, the company may become an acquisition candidate. If the commercial entity cannot continue, an orderly open-source stewardship path should remain possible.

The bad state is a large payroll, many bespoke enterprise promises, no reusable core, and dependence on another round to finish customer obligations.

Reading through Overall

The native reading. Claim status, evidence burden, proof gates, falsifiers, contradictions, capital-to-proof, governance, downside, and explicit reasons to stop or narrow the thesis.