The scientific room asks whether the method is sound. This one asks a narrower question: can I check the artifact without trusting whoever handed it to me?
What produced the records, and under whose authority.
Observation and source ancestry, including parents.
Digest chain over every transformation.
Model and method versions applied.
The profile version used for evaluation.
Declared gaps, conflicts and uncertainty.
Human determinations and when they occurred.
The communicative claim and its relying purpose.
The offline binary that checks all of the above.
A pass here means the chain is internally consistent and resolvable. It is not a scientific or institutional endorsement, and the report says so on its face.
An external recipient should be able to inspect and use an AgEvidence package without treating the hosted application as the sole authority.
Decisive proof is third-party reconstruction without proprietary hosted state. The falsifier: the verifier needs hidden Rails state, or canonicalization is unstable enough that two implementations disagree.
The native reading. Claim status, evidence burden, proof gates, falsifiers, contradictions, capital-to-proof, governance, downside, and explicit reasons to stop or narrow the thesis.