Governance and ownership
Open-core plus two jurisdictions plus multiple repositories creates unusual investability questions. They belong in a room, not an appendix.
| Item | Status | Blocking | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate structure | open | yes | US and Australian operations create domicile, tax and investor-rights questions. |
| IP chain of title | open | yes | Multiple repositories and prior technical assets. |
| Open-core boundary | complete | no | Ambiguity creates either customer distrust or uncertainty about what investors own. |
| Protocol stewardship | open | yes | Neutrality must survive the company's commercial incentives. |
| Related entity map | complete | no | Portfolio relatedness affects how early evidence is discounted. |
| Board and reserved matters | proposed | no | Gate-based capital release needs a governance mechanism. |
| Founder succession | open | no | Founder-led engineering is why the plan is lean, and the largest single risk. |
| Data rights and privacy | draft | no | Evidence carries source-system data across organisational boundaries. |
| Customer liability | draft | yes | Statements are used in consequential workflows. |
| Future financing | proposed | no | The plan must not assume the next round. |
Required evidence per item
IP chain of title
openOpen-core boundary
completeProtocol stewardship
openRelated entity map
completeBoard and reserved matters
proposedFounder succession
openData rights and privacy
draftCustomer liability
draftFuture financing
proposedThe open-source boundary is a governance instrument
Ambiguity here produces either customer distrust or uncertainty about what investors actually own. The boundary is therefore documented rather than implied by a licence file.
Every status on this board should come from a document, not from an assumption about what is probably fine.
Everything in this room
Independent is the verification index over the other three
Governance
The open-core structure creates governance questions that are part of investability.
Investors need clarity on the investee entity, IP chain of title, repository and license boundaries, protocol stewardship, related entities, board rights, data rights, customer liability, founder succession and future financing. The commercial company must be able to monetize operations without leaving ecosystem participants unsure whether the supposedly neutral evidence layer can be captured later.
The native reading. Claim status, evidence burden, proof gates, falsifiers, contradictions, capital-to-proof, governance, downside, and explicit reasons to stop or narrow the thesis.