Independent review · science claim

Evidence integrity, scientific validity and institutional validity remain distinct and are not collapsed by users.

Status
Proposed

A designed intention with no evidence yet.

Designed into the model. Empirical test of user behaviour is open.


No single gateFalsifier statedNext test stated
Why it matters

The consequence of being wrong

If false

An integrity pass gets read as scientific endorsement, which is a liability, not a feature.

If true

The verifier can be trusted precisely because it claims very little.

Current support
Scientific lineage dossierStatus vocabularyStatement design
Missing proof
Observation of how real relying parties interpret a passing verification.
Falsifier
Users routinely treat integrity results as scientific or regulatory approval.
Next decisive test
Structured interpretation study with external reviewers.
Connected views

The same claim in three other languages


Independent review

Everything in this room